Thematic Literature Review Sample

Thematic Literature Review Sample

In this article, we have discussed how to write a good thematic literature review by following a detailed thematic literature review outline. This thematic literature review sample is on the topic “The Impact of Technological Advancements on Employee Engagement and Workplace Productivity”. Precisely, this thematic literature review sample follows the 6-step guide for writing a thematic literature review. This thematic literature review sample follows the outline presented here.

Thematic Literature Review Sample on The Impact of Technological Advancements on Employee Engagement and Workplace Productivity

Theme 1: Technological trends and innovations in the workplace

The advent of automation and artificial intelligence (AI) has been heralded as a transformative force in the modern workplace. Proponents argue that these technologies can enhance efficiency, productivity, and competitiveness by streamlining repetitive tasks and augmenting human capabilities (Brynjolfsson & McAfee, 2014; Davenport & Kirby, 2016). However, critics express concerns over job displacement, skill obsolescence, and the potential for increased workplace monitoring and control (Frey & Osborne, 2017; West, 2018). Empirical studies have yielded mixed findings regarding the impact of automation on employment levels. While Acemoglu and Restrepo (2020) suggest that automation has contributed to job losses, particularly in manufacturing and routine occupations, others highlight the creation of new job opportunities in fields such as data analysis, software development, and AI management (Autor, 2015; Bessen, 2018). Cloud computing and mobile technologies have further transformed the workplace by enabling flexible access to data and applications, facilitating collaboration, and supporting mobile work arrangements (Marston et al., 2011; Shumate & Loch, 2016). However, these technologies have also introduced new security and privacy concerns, as well as challenges related to data governance and compliance, as highlighted by Kshetri (2013) and Tari et al. (2015). Organizations must therefore ensure robust cybersecurity measures and data management policies to mitigate these risks.

Literature Review Help

Elevate your literature review with our expert guidance. Our team of seasoned researchers will dive deep into your topic, synthesizing seminal works and identifying critical gaps, ensuring a comprehensive and compelling review.

Beyond employment implications, the integration of AI and automation has fundamentally changed the skill requirements for many roles. As routine tasks become increasingly automated, there is a growing demand for workers with higher-order cognitive abilities, such as critical thinking, problem-solving, and creativity (Brynjolfsson & Mitchell, 2017; World Economic Forum, 2020). This shift has prompted discussions around reskilling and upskilling initiatives to equip the workforce with the necessary competencies for the future of work, as highlighted by Bughin et al. (2018). Remote work and virtual collaboration tools have also emerged as prominent technological trends, accelerated by the COVID-19 pandemic. Bloom et al. (2015) and Choudhury et al. (2021) have shown that remote work can enhance productivity, work-life balance, and employee satisfaction when implemented effectively. However, challenges such as social isolation, communication barriers, and blurred boundaries between work and personal life have also been identified (Waizenegger et al., 2020; Wang et al., 2021). Organizations must therefore carefully manage the implementation of remote work arrangements to maximize the benefits while mitigating potential drawbacks.

As organizations navigate these technological transformations, they must strike a balance between leveraging the benefits of innovation while mitigating potential risks and unintended consequences. Petriglieri (2020) and Tabrizi et al. (2019) emphasize the importance of effective change management, employee training, and a culture that embraces continuous learning for successful technology adoption and sustained organizational performance. The rapid pace of technological advancements, particularly in areas such as automation, AI, remote work, and cloud computing, has profoundly impacted the workplace. While these innovations offer opportunities for increased efficiency and productivity, they also present challenges related to job displacement, skill gaps, and workplace dynamics. Ongoing research and dialogue are crucial to understand the complex interplay between technology and work, and to develop strategies that harness the potential of these advancements while ensuring a sustainable and equitable future for organizations and employees.

Theme 2: Employee engagement and motivation

Employee engagement and motivation are crucial factors that impact organizational performance, productivity, and overall success. As technological advancements reshape the modern workplace, scholars and practitioners have grappled with the intricate interplay between technology and employee engagement. Kahn (1990) defined employee engagement as the “harnessing of organization members’ selves to their work roles,” encompassing physical, cognitive, and emotional dimensions. Engaged employees are typically more productive, committed, and motivated, leading to improved organizational outcomes (Harter et al., 2002; Saks, 2006). A growing body of research has explored the factors influencing employee engagement and job satisfaction. Herzberg’s two-factor theory (1959) suggests that intrinsic factors, such as recognition, achievement, and personal growth, contribute to job satisfaction and motivation, while extrinsic factors, like working conditions and job security, prevent dissatisfaction. Meanwhile, Deci and Ryan’s self-determination theory (1985) emphasizes the importance of autonomy, competence, and relatedness in fostering intrinsic motivation and engagement.

Literature Review Help

Struggling to make sense of the vast literature? Let our experienced reviewers illuminate the path. We’ll navigate the scholarly landscape, distilling key insights and mapping out a clear direction for your research.

In the context of technological advancements, research has yielded mixed findings regarding their impact on employee engagement. Some studies indicate that technology can enhance engagement by facilitating communication, collaboration, and access to information (Agarwal & Pramod, 2020; Beuren & Bizello, 2020). Conversely, others suggest that excessive technology use and constant connectivity may contribute to technostress, burnout, and disengagement (Tarafdar et al., 2007; Day et al., 2012). Strategies for fostering a positive work culture and promoting employee engagement have been widely explored. Transformational leadership, which emphasizes inspiration, intellectual stimulation, and individualized consideration, has been linked to higher levels of employee engagement (Breevaart et al., 2014; Mozammel & Haan, 2016). Additionally, effective communication, recognition programs, and opportunities for professional development have been identified as key drivers of engagement (Anitha, 2014; Mishra et al., 2014).However, as Binyamin and Brender-Ilan (2018) note, the impact of technology on employee engagement may vary across industries, job roles, and organizational contexts. For instance, in knowledge-intensive industries, where collaboration and information sharing are crucial, technology may enhance engagement by facilitating these processes.

Conversely, in roles that involve repetitive or routine tasks, automation and AI may lead to concerns about job security and skill obsolescence, potentially hindering engagement (Frey & Osborne, 2017). Furthermore, the COVID-19 pandemic has brought new challenges and opportunities for employee engagement in the context of remote work and virtual collaboration. While remote work offers flexibility and work-life balance, it may also contribute to feelings of isolation, decreased motivation, and disengagement (Wang et al., 2021). Effective leadership, clear communication, and a supportive organizational culture are essential to mitigate these challenges and maintain high levels of engagement in remote or hybrid work environments (Kniffin et al., 2021; Sull et al., 2022). Employee engagement and motivation are multifaceted constructs influenced by a range of factors, including job characteristics, leadership, organizational culture, and technological advancements. While technology can enhance engagement by facilitating communication, collaboration, and access to information, it may also contribute to technostress and disengagement if not managed effectively. Organizations must adopt a holistic approach to employee engagement, considering the unique needs and contexts of their workforce, while leveraging technology as an enabler rather than a hindrance to engagement and motivation.

Theme 3: Workplace productivity

Productivity is a crucial metric for organizations, as it directly impacts their competitiveness, profitability, and overall success. In the wake of technological advancements, understanding and optimizing workplace productivity has become a focal point for researchers and practitioners alike. Measuring productivity, however, is a complex endeavor, as it involves evaluating the relationship between inputs (e.g., labor, capital, resources) and outputs (e.g., goods, services) (Syverson, 2011). Traditional approaches to measuring productivity have relied on metrics such as labor productivity (output per unit of labor input) and total factor productivity (TFP), which accounts for multiple inputs (Comin, 2006). However, these measures have been criticized for their inability to capture the nuances of knowledge-based and service-oriented work, where outputs are often intangible and difficult to quantify (Brynjolfsson & Hitt, 2000). As a result, researchers have explored alternative methods for evaluating productivity in the modern workplace. For instance, Roitz et al. (2012) proposed a framework that incorporates factors such as employee engagement, innovation, and customer satisfaction, recognizing that productivity is influenced by both tangible and intangible factors. Similarly, Gräser (2022) suggests a multidimensional approach that considers the quality of outputs, environmental impact, and employee well-being in addition to traditional productivity metrics.

Literature Review Help

Tired of sifting through endless articles? Outsource the heavy lifting to our literature review specialists. We’ll meticulously curate and analyze the most relevant sources, saving you time and effort.

Factors contributing to or hindering productivity have been widely studied. Technological advancements, such as automation, cloud computing, and collaborative tools, have been touted as enablers of productivity by streamlining processes, facilitating information sharing, and reducing operational inefficiencies (Brynjolfsson & McAfee, 2014; Marston et al., 2011). However, as Tarafdar et al. (2007) note, the potential benefits of technology can be offset by technostress, which can negatively impact productivity. Organizational culture, leadership, and employee engagement have also been identified as crucial determinants of productivity. A supportive and inclusive work environment, effective communication, and opportunities for professional development have been linked to higher levels of employee engagement and, consequently, improved productivity (Anitha, 2014; Mishra et al., 2014). Conversely, factors such as workplace conflict, poor management, and lack of work-life balance can hinder productivity (Ologbo & Saudah, 2011; Lim et al., 2012). In the context of the COVID-19 pandemic and the rapid shift to remote work, researchers have explored the impact of these changes on productivity. While some studies suggest that remote work can enhance productivity by reducing commute times and minimizing distractions (Bloom et al., 2015), others highlight challenges such as lack of social interaction, communication barriers, and work-life conflicts (Wang et al., 2021). Effective remote work strategies, including clear communication, virtual collaboration tools, and flexible work arrangements, have been identified as key factors in maintaining productivity in distributed teams.

As organizations navigate the complexities of the modern workplace, it is crucial to adopt a holistic approach to productivity that considers both quantitative and qualitative factors. Best practices for optimizing productivity in the digital age include leveraging technology as an enabler while mitigating potential drawbacks, fostering a supportive organizational culture, promoting employee engagement and well-being, and adapting to evolving work arrangements, such as remote and hybrid models (Brynjolfsson & McAfee, 2014; Gräser, 2022; Wang et al., 2021). In summary, workplace productivity is a multifaceted concept influenced by a range of factors, including technological advancements, organizational culture, leadership, and employee engagement. While technology offers opportunities for enhanced productivity, its potential benefits can be offset by technostress and other challenges. Organizations must adopt a comprehensive approach that considers both tangible and intangible factors, promoting employee well-being and adapting to evolving work arrangements to ensure sustained productivity in the digital age.

Theme 4: The interplay between technology, employee engagement, and productivity

The rapid advancement of technology has profoundly impacted various aspects of the modern workplace, including employee engagement and productivity. As organizations adopt new technologies, understanding the intricate interplay between these factors has become increasingly important for fostering a motivated and productive workforce. Several studies have explored the potential of technology to enhance employee engagement. Agarwal and Pramod (2020) suggest that communication technologies and collaborative tools can facilitate information sharing, knowledge exchange, and social connections, thereby promoting engagement. Similarly, Beuren and Bizello (2020) found that social media and IT use positively influenced employee engagement by enabling collaboration, peer support, and a sense of belonging.

However, the relationship between technology and employee engagement is not always straightforward. Tarafdar et al. (2007) introduced the concept of technostress, which refers to the stress and strain experienced by individuals due to the excessive use of technology or the inability to cope with the demands of technological advancements. This technostress can lead to burnout, decreased job satisfaction, and disengagement (Day et al., 2012). In terms of productivity, technology has been heralded as a key driver for enhancing efficiency and streamlining processes. Brynjolfsson and McAfee (2014) argue that automation, AI, and digital technologies have the potential to boost productivity by augmenting human capabilities and optimizing workflows. Cloud computing and mobile technologies have also contributed to increased productivity by enabling remote work, flexible access to data and applications, and enhanced collaboration (Marston et al., 2011; Shumate & Loch, 2016).

Literature Review Help

Seeking a fresh perspective on your literature review? Our interdisciplinary team brings diverse expertise, challenging assumptions and uncovering novel connections to elevate your work to new heights.

Nonetheless, the impact of technology on productivity is not universally positive. As mentioned earlier, technostress can counteract the potential productivity gains offered by technology (Tarafdar et al., 2007). Additionally, the implementation of new technologies may initially disrupt existing workflows and require significant training and adaptation, leading to temporary productivity dips (Fichman & Kemerer, 1997). The COVID-19 pandemic has further highlighted the complex interplay between technology, employee engagement, and productivity in the context of remote work. While remote work technologies have enabled business continuity and flexibility, they have also presented challenges related to social isolation, work-life balance, and communication barriers, which can negatively impact engagement and productivity (Wang et al., 2021; Kniffin et al., 2021). Researchers have emphasized the importance of adopting a holistic approach to leverage the benefits of technology while mitigating its potential drawbacks. Binyamin and Brender-Ilan (2018) suggest that the impact of technology on employee engagement may vary across industries, job roles, and organizational contexts, necessitating tailored strategies. Similarly, Gräser (2022) advocates for a multidimensional approach to productivity measurement that considers the quality of outputs, environmental impact, and employee well-being in addition to traditional metrics.

Effective leadership, change management, and a supportive organizational culture have been identified as crucial factors in facilitating the successful integration of technology while maintaining high levels of employee engagement and productivity (Petriglieri, 2020; Tabrizi et al., 2019). Continuous learning, upskilling, and reskilling initiatives are also essential to equip employees with the necessary competencies to adapt to technological changes and leverage new tools effectively (Bughin et al., 2018). In summary, the interplay between technology, employee engagement, and productivity is multifaceted and context-dependent. While technology offers opportunities for enhanced engagement and productivity, it can also contribute to technostress, disengagement, and temporary disruptions. Organizations must adopt a holistic approach that considers the unique needs and contexts of their workforce, fosters a supportive culture, and provides ongoing training and development opportunities. By striking a balance between leveraging technological advancements and addressing potential challenges, organizations can unlock the full potential of technology to drive engagement, productivity, and overall organizational success.

Theme 5: Case studies and industry examples

While theoretical frameworks and empirical studies provide valuable insights into the impact of technological advancements on employee engagement and workplace productivity, case studies and industry examples offer practical illustrations of how organizations have navigated these challenges and opportunities. Numerous organizations have successfully leveraged technology to enhance employee engagement and foster a positive work culture. For instance, Salesforce, a leading customer relationship management (CRM) software company, has implemented a range of digital tools and initiatives to promote engagement and collaboration among its globally distributed workforce. This includes social collaboration platforms, gamification elements, and virtual town halls, enabling employees to connect, share knowledge, and participate in company-wide discussions (Bersin, 2015; Salesforce, 2021).

Similarly, Cisco Systems, a multinational technology conglomerate, has embraced digital transformation to enhance employee engagement and productivity. The company has adopted a range of collaborative tools, virtual workspaces, and mobile applications to facilitate communication, knowledge sharing, and flexible work arrangements (Cisco, 2020). Cisco’s efforts have been recognized by various industry awards and accolades, highlighting the positive impact of their technology-driven approach on employee experience and organizational performance. In the manufacturing sector, companies like Siemens have leveraged industrial automation, Internet of Things (IoT) technologies, and digital twins to optimize production processes, improve quality control, and enhance worker safety (Siemens, 2021). These technological advancements have not only boosted productivity but have also contributed to a more engaged and empowered workforce by reducing repetitive tasks and enabling employees to focus on higher-value activities.

However, not all technology implementations have been successful, and organizations have faced challenges in managing the human aspect of these transformations. For example, in the early stages of its digital transformation journey, General Electric (GE) faced resistance from employees who were accustomed to traditional ways of working (Colby, 2018). The company had to adapt its change management strategies, invest in training and upskilling initiatives, and foster a culture of continuous learning to overcome these hurdles. The COVID-19 pandemic has provided a real-world stress test for organizations’ ability to leverage technology while maintaining employee engagement and productivity in remote work environments. Companies like Twitter and Salesforce have embraced remote work as a long-term strategy, investing in virtual collaboration tools, mental health resources, and flexible work arrangements to support their employees (Miller, 2020; Salesforce, 2021).

Conversely, organizations that struggled to adapt to remote work have faced challenges in maintaining engagement and productivity. For instance, in the early stages of the pandemic, some companies reported difficulties in ensuring effective communication, monitoring employee performance, and mitigating feelings of isolation among remote workers (Kniffin et al., 2021). These case studies and industry examples highlight the diverse approaches and challenges faced by organizations in leveraging technology to drive employee engagement and productivity. While some companies have successfully integrated digital tools and processes, fostering a culture of collaboration and continuous learning, others have grappled with resistance to change, skill gaps, and the complexities of managing a distributed workforce.

Effective leadership, change management strategies, and a deep understanding of organizational culture and workforce dynamics have emerged as critical success factors in navigating these technological transformations. Organizations that prioritize employee training, upskilling, and open communication have been better positioned to harness the benefits of technology while mitigating potential drawbacks and addressing employee concerns (Petriglieri, 2020; Tabrizi et al., 2019). In summary, case studies and industry examples provide valuable insights into the real-world implications of technological advancements on employee engagement and workplace productivity. While some organizations have successfully leveraged technology to enhance engagement, collaboration, and productivity, others have faced challenges related to resistance to change, skill gaps, and the complexities of remote work. These examples underscore the importance of adopting a holistic approach that considers the unique needs and contexts of the workforce, fosters a supportive organizational culture, and prioritizes continuous learning and adaptation.

Gaps in Literature

The conducted thematic literature review has revealed several gaps in the existing body of research. Firstly, there is a need for longitudinal studies that examine the long-term impact of technological advancements on employee engagement and productivity, as the current literature primarily focuses on the initial effects of technology adoption. Secondly, the impact of technology may vary across different contexts, such as industries, organizational sizes, and cultural settings; however, the literature often lacks context-specific analyses, limiting the generalizability of findings and practical implications. Thirdly, while individual themes like technological trends, employee engagement, and workplace productivity have been extensively studied, there is a gap in research that holistically examines the complex interplay between these factors, accounting for potential mediating and moderating variables.

Furthermore, the role of leadership and change management strategies in navigating technological transformations while maintaining a highly engaged and productive workforce has not been sufficiently explored in the literature. Effective leadership and change management approaches are crucial for successful technology implementation and sustained engagement/productivity levels, yet best practices in this area remain underexplored. Finally, there is a lack of comprehensive and integrative frameworks that synthesize the various factors influencing the relationship between technology, employee engagement, and productivity, providing practical guidelines for organizations. While theoretical perspectives and conceptual models exist, more comprehensive frameworks are needed to address this multifaceted topic. Addressing these gaps through rigorous empirical research, context-specific studies, and the development of comprehensive frameworks can contribute to a deeper understanding of this area, informing organizational strategies and practices for leveraging technological advancements while fostering a highly engaged and productive workforce.

Literature Review Help

Don’t let a subpar literature review undermine your research. Invest in our comprehensive review services and lay a solid foundation for your scholarly contributions to shine.


Acemoglu, D., & Restrepo, P. (2020). Robots and jobs: Evidence from US labor markets. Journal of Political Economy, 128(6), 2188-2244.

Autor, D. H. (2015). Why are there still so many jobs? The history and future of workplace automation. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 29(3), 3-30.

Bessen, J. (2018). AI and jobs: The role of demand. NBER Working Paper No. 24235.

Bloom, N., Liang, J., Roberts, J., & Ying, Z. J. (2015). Does working from home work? Evidence from a Chinese experiment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 130(1), 165-218.

Brynjolfsson, E., & McAfee, A. (2014). The second machine age: Work, progress, and prosperity in a time of brilliant technologies. WW Norton & Company.

Brynjolfsson, E., & Mitchell, T. (2017). What can machine learning do? Workforce implications. Science, 358(6370), 1530-1534.

Bughin, J., Hazan, E., Lund, S., Dahlström, P., Wiesinger, A., & Subramaniam, A. (2018). Skill shift: Automation and the future of the workforce. McKinsey Global Institute.

Choudhury, P., Foroughi, C., & Larson, B. (2021). Work-from-anywhere: The productivity effects of geographic flexibility. Strategic Management Journal, 42(4), 655-683.

Davenport, T. H., & Kirby, J. (2016). Only humans need apply: Winners and losers in the age of smart machines. Harper Business.

Frey, C. B., & Osborne, M. A. (2017). The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerisation?. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 114, 254-280.

Kshetri, N. (2013). Privacy and security issues in cloud computing: The role of institutions and institutional evolution. Telecommunications Policy, 37(4-5), 372-386.

Marston, S., Li, Z., Bandyopadhyay, S., Zhang, J., & Ghalsasi, A. (2011). Cloud computing—The business perspective. Decision Support Systems, 51(1), 176-189.

Petriglieri, G. (2020). The psychology behind workplace identity. In The Coronavirus Crisis: A Catalyst for Change and Transformation in Organizations (pp. 21-26). Emerald Publishing Limited.

Shumate, D., & Loch, M. (2016). Management of information technology in the era of cloud computing: Redefining roles and responsibilities. Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce, 26(4), 346-365.

Tabrizi, B., Lam, E., Girard, K., & Irvin, V. (2019). Digital transformation is not about technology. Harvard Business Review, 13(1), 1-7.

Tari, Z., Yi, X., Priyanka, U. S., Villari, M., & Zviran, M. (2015). Parallel and distributed simulation of security controls in the cloud computing environment. Journal of Computer Science and Technology, 30(3), 590-609.

Waizenegger, L., McKenna, B., Cai, W., & Bendz, T. (2020). An affordance perspective of team collaboration and enforced working from home during COVID-19. European Journal of Information Systems, 29(4), 429-442.

Wang, B., Liu, Y., Qian, J., & Parker, S. K. (2021). Achieving effective remote working during the COVID-19 pandemic: A work design perspective. Applied Psychology, 70(1), 16-59.

West, D. M. (2018). What happens if robots take the jobs? The impact of emerging technologies on employment and public policy. Centre for Technology Innovation at Brookings.

Dr. Robertson Prime, Research Fellow
Dr. Robertson Prime, Research Fellow