Barriers to Service Access Among Immigrant Families Navigating Child Welfare Systems

Introduction

Immigrant families involved with child welfare systems face a distinctive constellation of barriers, linguistic, legal, cultural, and structural, that shape whether they can meaningfully access the services these systems are designed to provide, yet the lived experience of navigating these barriers from the perspective of immigrant parents and caregivers themselves remains comparatively underexamined relative to the substantial administrative and outcomes-focused literature on immigrant families’ child welfare involvement (Dettlaff & Fong, 2021; Finno-Velasquez, 2022). Existing research has documented disparities in service referral, case duration, and reunification outcomes for immigrant-headed families, but has offered less sustained qualitative attention to how immigrant parents themselves understand, interpret, and attempt to overcome the barriers they encounter when required to engage with caseworkers, courts, and mandated services (Church & Baldwin, 2021; Ayon, 2020). This chapter introduces the background, problem, purpose, and design of a qualitative study examining the barriers to service access experienced by immigrant families navigating child welfare systems, grounded in the perspectives of immigrant parents and caregivers themselves, and situates this inquiry within existing social work theory and the empirical literature on immigrant family child welfare involvement.

Background Of The Study

Immigrant families are disproportionately represented within certain child welfare caseloads in some jurisdictions and underrepresented in others, a pattern that scholars attribute not to differential rates of underlying child maltreatment but to differences in surveillance exposure, mandated reporter contact, and community trust in child protective systems across immigrant populations (Dettlaff & Fong, 2021). Once involved with the system, however, immigrant families across most studied contexts experience longer case durations, lower rates of family reunification, and reduced access to court-mandated services relative to native-born families, disparities that persist even after controlling for case severity and demographic covariates (Finno-Velasquez, 2022; Font et al., 2021).

A substantial body of research has identified structural and linguistic barriers as central contributors to these disparities. Limited English proficiency has been repeatedly documented as an obstacle to meaningful participation in case planning, court proceedings, and service engagement, compounded by inconsistent availability of qualified interpretation and translated case documentation across child welfare jurisdictions (Ayon, 2020; Perreira & Ornelas, 2021). Immigration status itself introduces a distinct set of barriers, as parents with insecure or undocumented status frequently report fear that engagement with child welfare authorities, courts, or public service agencies could trigger immigration enforcement consequences, a fear scholars have termed chilling effects on service utilization that extend well beyond formally mandated child welfare contact into broader avoidance of public systems generally (Androff & Tavassoli, 2022; Zayas & Bradlee, 2021).

Cultural barriers constitute a further recurring theme, with qualitative research documenting that culturally specific parenting norms, family structures, and conceptions of appropriate discipline are sometimes misread by caseworkers unfamiliar with immigrant families’ cultural contexts, producing case plans and service mandates that immigrant parents experience as culturally incongruent or unresponsive to their actual family circumstances (Ayon, 2020; Fong, 2021). Structural barriers, including transportation limitations, inflexible service scheduling, unfamiliarity with the bureaucratic logic of the child welfare and family court systems, and the absence of culturally and linguistically matched service providers, compound these linguistic, legal, and cultural obstacles, producing what several scholars describe as a cumulative, multiplicative burden rather than a set of discrete, independently addressable problems (Church & Baldwin, 2021; Perreira & Ornelas, 2021).

While this body of research has productively documented the categories of barriers immigrant families face, much of it relies on administrative data analysis or caseworker-reported perspectives, with comparatively fewer qualitative studies centering the direct, first-person accounts of immigrant parents themselves regarding how they experience, interpret, and attempt to navigate these barriers over the course of their child welfare involvement (Dettlaff & Fong, 2021; Font et al., 2021). This leaves an incomplete understanding of the lived, subjective dimension of barrier navigation, including the coping strategies, sources of support, and points of institutional distrust that shape immigrant families’ engagement with child welfare services from their own vantage point.

Statement Of The Problem

Immigrant families involved with child welfare systems experience well-documented disparities in service access and case outcomes relative to native-born families, yet the existing literature has relied predominantly on administrative data and caseworker-reported perspectives, leaving insufficiently examined the first-person experiences of immigrant parents and caregivers themselves regarding the specific barriers they encounter and the strategies they employ, or fail to employ, in attempting to overcome them (Dettlaff & Fong, 2021; Finno-Velasquez, 2022). Without qualitative research centering immigrant parents’ own perspectives, child welfare agencies and policymakers lack a sufficiently grounded understanding of which barriers immigrant families themselves identify as most consequential, and how institutional distrust, fear of immigration enforcement, and cultural miscommunication interact with one another in parents’ actual, lived navigation of the system (Androff & Tavassoli, 2022; Ayon, 2020).

This gap is problematic because child welfare agencies continue to design and implement service delivery reforms, including interpretation services, cultural competency training, and immigration-status protections, without sufficiently grounded evidence regarding how immigrant parents themselves experience and evaluate these interventions, risking reforms that address administratively visible barriers while leaving less visible, relationally mediated barriers, such as institutional distrust and fear of enforcement consequences, inadequately addressed (Perreira & Ornelas, 2021; Zayas & Bradlee, 2021). Absent this grounded qualitative evidence, child welfare policy and practice risk continuing to underserve immigrant families precisely in the domains where administrative data are least able to capture the barriers that matter most to the families themselves (Fong, 2021).

Purpose Of The Study

The purpose of this qualitative, phenomenological study is to explore the lived experiences of immigrant parents and caregivers navigating barriers to service access within child welfare systems, in order to develop a grounded understanding of the barriers they identify as most significant, the strategies they employ to overcome or cope with these barriers, and the ways institutional distrust and fear of immigration enforcement shape their engagement with mandated services. Semi-structured interviews will be conducted with immigrant parents and caregivers who have had direct, personal involvement with child welfare systems, and data will be analyzed using established phenomenological analytic procedures to identify shared thematic structures across participants’ experiences.

Research Questions

RQ1. What barriers to service access do immigrant parents and caregivers identify as most significant in their navigation of child welfare systems?

RQ2. How do immigrant parents and caregivers describe the strategies, resources, and sources of support they draw upon in attempting to overcome these barriers?

RQ3. How does fear of immigration enforcement consequences shape immigrant parents’ and caregivers’ willingness to engage with child welfare caseworkers, courts, and mandated services?

RQ4. How do immigrant parents and caregivers experience and evaluate the cultural responsiveness of the caseworkers, service providers, and court personnel with whom they interact?

Significance Of The Study

This study carries significance for social work theory, child welfare practice, and immigration-informed policy design. Theoretically, the study extends the ecological and cultural humility frameworks that inform contemporary immigrant-focused social work practice by grounding these frameworks in the direct, first-person accounts of immigrant parents navigating child welfare involvement, addressing a persistent gap between conceptual frameworks and empirically grounded lived experience (Fong, 2021; Ayon, 2020).

Practically, findings may directly inform child welfare agency practice regarding interpretation service delivery, caseworker cultural competency training, and immigration-status protection policies, providing evidence-based guidance grounded in what immigrant parents themselves identify as the most consequential barriers to meaningful service engagement (Perreira & Ornelas, 2021). Given continuing policy debate regarding the relationship between immigration enforcement and public-serving institutions such as child welfare and family courts, evidence clarifying how fear of enforcement consequences shapes immigrant families’ engagement with mandated services carries substantial relevance to firewall and sanctuary-policy debates at the agency and jurisdictional level (Androff & Tavassoli, 2022; Zayas & Bradlee, 2021). More broadly, this study contributes to the growing scholarly effort to center marginalized and system-involved populations’ own perspectives within child welfare research, rather than relying predominantly on administrative or professional-informant data (Dettlaff & Fong, 2021).

Theoretical Framework

This study is grounded in the ecological systems framework as applied to immigrant family child welfare involvement, which conceptualizes immigrant families’ experiences as shaped by the dynamic interaction of individual, family, community, and institutional-level factors, including immigration status, community resource availability, and the responsiveness of child welfare institutions themselves (Dettlaff & Fong, 2021). This framework provides the conceptual basis for treating barriers to service access not as isolated, discrete obstacles but as interacting factors operating across multiple ecological levels simultaneously.

This ecological framework is paired with cultural humility theory, which emphasizes an ongoing process of self-reflection and institutional accountability, rather than a fixed state of cultural competence, as the appropriate orientation for professionals serving culturally diverse and immigrant populations, and which has been increasingly applied within child welfare practice to critique culturally incongruent case planning and service mandates (Ayon, 2020; Fong, 2021). Integrating these two frameworks allows the study to examine both the structural, multi-level barriers immigrant families encounter and the relational, culturally mediated dynamics of trust and institutional responsiveness that shape how those barriers are experienced and navigated from the immigrant parent’s own perspective.

Nature Of The Study

This study will employ a qualitative, phenomenological design intended to capture the essential structure of immigrant parents’ and caregivers’ lived experience navigating barriers to service access within child welfare systems (Creswell & Creswell, 2023). Semi-structured, in-depth interviews will be conducted with immigrant parents and caregivers who have had direct, personal child welfare system involvement within the preceding three years, recruited through partnerships with community-based immigrant service organizations and legal aid providers using purposive and snowball sampling strategies.

Interviews will be conducted in participants’ preferred language using qualified interpretation where necessary, audio-recorded with consent, transcribed, and translated as needed prior to analysis. Data will be analyzed using Moustakas’s transcendental phenomenological analytic procedure, involving horizonalization of significant statements, clustering of meaning units into emergent themes, and construction of textural and structural descriptions culminating in a composite description of the essence of participants’ shared experience navigating child welfare service access barriers. Trustworthiness will be supported through member checking, reflexive journaling, and peer debriefing throughout the analytic process.

Definitions Of Key Terms

Immigrant familyA family unit in which one or more parents or primary caregivers were born outside the country of current residence, encompassing documented, undocumented, and mixed-status family configurations (Finno-Velasquez, 2022).

Child welfare systemThe network of public and private agencies, courts, and mandated services responsible for investigating allegations of child maltreatment and overseeing family case planning, reunification, and, where necessary, out-of-home placement (Dettlaff & Fong, 2021).

Chilling effectThe suppression of an individual’s or family’s willingness to engage with public institutions or services due to fear that such engagement may trigger adverse immigration enforcement consequences (Androff & Tavassoli, 2022).

Cultural humilityAn orientation of ongoing self-reflection, openness, and institutional accountability toward culturally diverse populations, as distinguished from a fixed or completed state of cultural competence (Fong, 2021).

Mixed-status familyA family in which members hold differing immigration or citizenship statuses, such as a household including both undocumented parents and U.S.-citizen children (Zayas & Bradlee, 2021).

Service access barrierAny linguistic, legal, cultural, or structural obstacle that impedes a family’s ability to meaningfully engage with mandated or voluntary child welfare services (Church & Baldwin, 2021).

Assumptions

This study operates under several assumptions. It is assumed that immigrant parent and caregiver participants will be willing and able to speak candidly about their experiences navigating child welfare involvement, notwithstanding the sensitive and potentially legally consequential nature of the topic, and that appropriate consent, confidentiality, and trust-building procedures will support this candor. It is assumed that qualified interpretation, where used, will accurately convey the substantive and affective content of participants’ accounts without meaningful loss of meaning. It is further assumed that community-based immigrant service organizations and legal aid providers serving as recruitment partners maintain sufficient trust with the immigrant families they serve to facilitate genuine, non-coerced participation, and that the phenomenological analytic approach selected is appropriate for capturing the shared structure of experience across participants from differing national origins and immigration circumstances.

Scope And Delimitations

The scope of this study is delimited to immigrant parents and caregivers with direct, personal involvement with child welfare systems within the preceding three years, and does not include the perspectives of child welfare caseworkers, judges, or other system professionals, nor the perspectives of the children involved in these cases. The study is further delimited to family-level child protective involvement, including investigation, in-home services, and reunification-track cases, and does not extend to immigration-specific child welfare contexts such as unaccompanied minor custody proceedings. The study is delimited to a single geographic region and does not attempt to capture jurisdictional variation in child welfare policy, immigration enforcement practice, or immigrant community composition across different regions or states.

Limitations

Several limitations should be acknowledged. The reliance on purposive and snowball sampling through community-based organizational partnerships may systematically include immigrant families with greater pre-existing community connection and trust, potentially underrepresenting the most isolated or distrustful families, who may also be those experiencing the most severe barriers to service access. The sensitive, potentially legally consequential nature of child welfare involvement may lead some participants to withhold or moderate certain aspects of their experience despite confidentiality assurances, particularly regarding immigration status or interactions perceived as legally risky to disclose. The use of interpretation for participants who are not proficient in the primary research language introduces the possibility of subtle loss of nuance in translation, notwithstanding the use of qualified interpreters. Finally, the study’s delimitation to a single geographic region limits the generalizability of findings to immigrant families navigating child welfare systems under differing state policies, enforcement climates, and immigrant community resources elsewhere (Finno-Velasquez, 2022).

Summary

This chapter introduced the background, problem, purpose, and theoretical grounding of a proposed qualitative, phenomenological study examining the barriers to service access experienced by immigrant families navigating child welfare systems, grounded in the first-person perspectives of immigrant parents and caregivers themselves. While existing research has documented substantial disparities in child welfare service access and outcomes for immigrant families, this literature has relied predominantly on administrative and professional-informant data, leaving the lived, subjective experience of barrier navigation from immigrant parents’ own perspective comparatively underexamined. Grounded in ecological systems theory and cultural humility theory, this qualitative study aims to develop a grounded understanding of the barriers immigrant families identify as most significant, the strategies they employ to navigate them, and the role of institutional distrust and immigration enforcement fear in shaping their engagement with mandated services, with implications for child welfare practice, agency policy, and immigration-informed service design. Chapter Two will present a comprehensive review of the existing literature on immigrant families’ child welfare involvement, service access barriers, and culturally responsive practice, further situating this study within its scholarly context.

References

Androff, D., & Tavassoli, K. Y. (2022). Deaths in the desert: The human rights crisis on the U.S.-Mexico border and its implications for immigrant-serving systems. Social Work, 67(1), 45–54.

Ayon, C. (2020). Building resilience in immigrant families: A cultural humility approach to child welfare practice. Families in Society, 101(4), 415–428.

Church, W. T., II, & Baldwin, J. (2021). Structural barriers to service access for Latino immigrant families in the child welfare system. Child and Family Social Work, 26(2), 235–244.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2023). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Dettlaff, A. J., & Fong, R. (2021). Child welfare practice with immigrant families: An ecological approach. Columbia University Press.

Finno-Velasquez, M. (2022). Immigrant-origin families and the child welfare system: A review of disparities in service access and case outcomes. Journal of Public Child Welfare, 16(1), 1–24.

Fong, R. (2021). Cultural humility and structural competency in child welfare practice with immigrant families. Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Diversity in Social Work, 30(3), 189–202.

Font, S. A., Sattler, K. M. P., & Gershoff, E. T. (2021). Racial and ethnic disparities in child protective services: A national analysis. Child Maltreatment, 26(1), 3–15.

Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. SAGE Publications.

Perreira, K. M., & Ornelas, I. (2021). Painful passages: Traumatic experiences and post-traumatic stress among immigrant Latino adolescents and their primary caregivers. International Migration Review, 55(1), 155–184.

Roberts, D. E. (2022). Child welfare’s disproportionate impact on immigrant and communities of color: Structural drivers and policy responses. Columbia Journal of Race and Law, 12(2), 245–271.

Salcido, R. M., & Adelman, R. M. (2020). He has no rights here: Undocumented Latino immigrant parents’ experiences with the child welfare system. International Social Work, 63(2), 218–232.

Suarez-Orozco, C., Yoshikawa, H., & Teranishi, R. T. (2021). Growing up in the shadows: The developmental implications of unauthorized status. Harvard Educational Review, 91(2), 259–283.

Yohani, S., & Kirova, A. (2020). Interpreters as cultural brokers in child welfare services for immigrant and refugee families. Child & Family Social Work, 25(3), 645–654.

Zayas, L. H., & Bradlee, M. H. (2021). Exiling children, creating orphans: When immigration policies hurt citizen children and their families. Social Work, 66(1), 29–38.

◆